[PCW] Fuel economy, Chrysalis across the Atlantic

kevinr kevinr at regencyyachts.com
Thu Jan 17 09:19:51 EST 2008


I don't believe either length or displacement is a fair comparison,
especially when comparing a heavily built displacement vessel like Nordhavn
to a power cat that is capable of achieving twice the speed (thus has to be
more weight sensitive). I think the industry (manufacturers) should start to
publish either square footage or even volumetric measurements (gross
tonnage?) so that the buying public can easily compare different models.
This after all is how the building trade has been doing it for years, it's
not enough to say it's a "4 bedroom, 3 bath house", but also sq. ft. "under
air" and total sq. footage.

This is especially true when trying to compare power cats with monohulls.

Kevin Ralph
 
Regency Yachts LLC
Office: 954 563 0666
Cell:     954 648 0855
Fax:     954 564 4244
e-mail:  kevinr @regencyyachts.com
 
Look up vessels for sale by name or scan for vessels by size, budget or
manufacture at www.regencyyachts.com.  
 
Looking for new cruising grounds? Check out Belize, it's closer than you
think! www.belizemarina.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: power-catamaran-bounces at lists.samurai.com
[mailto:power-catamaran-bounces at lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of bill
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 8:48 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] Fuel economy, Chrysalis across the Atlantic

John Holbrook wrote;

"Looking at the plans for the 60ft Wild Wind on
Malcolm's site it would
 appear that the inside space is about the same as a
60ft monohull...
 possibly the spaces on a monohull have more headroom.
I'm only looking at
 plans here and would be interested to here from
people who have been
 aboard both. "

I ask, what is a valid basis for comparison of multi's
vs mono's?

WWIV is listed on Malcolm's website as displacing
#73,819.

This falls between the Nordhavn 46 #60,000, and the
Norhavn 47 #85,000.  WWIV certainly has more
accomodation than either of these.

My current project, a #56,000 powercat, 62', comes in
between the Nordhavn 43 and 46, weightwise.

The Nordhavn 55 weighs in at a whopping 56.6T, twice
my displacement!

Is length comparison apples to apples?


regards,
Bill
 




 
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List


More information about the Power-Catamaran mailing list