[PUP] Nanopulser or mega ripoff?

[2elnav at netbistro.com]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry Rolon" <trolon at trolon.net>

> Has anyone used this gizmo?
> http://www.pulsegenetech.co.jp/en/what/index.html
>
> Any comments? It's almost too early to tell much about whether or not is
> does any good, but does it do any harm


REPLY
Terry  the original patent holder  developed this technology for the US army 
back in around 1985 or earlier.
By 1997  they got permission to  sell it to the public. I first became aware 
of it in 2000 and  began testing it.
Although my initial  reaction was  "this must be snake oil"  i was 
surprised to discover the product actually did do what it claimed. 
Therriginal company  is called Pulsetech.   See www.pulsetech.com  Over the 
years other people also found it does work and  of course  a number of 
imitators and clones hit the market.
Ther was one guy  in Hawaii who figured out how to build his own. He 
probably  read the patent notes and  used that for a schematic.   He calimed 
he could  build it for around $20 in parts and of course it looked home 
built.  But it also worked.  One of the early  issues was RFI.   To  reduce 
interference   various methods weer tried.  REduced powr and or  changed 
frequency.  I became of one test done locally to me wher a "Batery Minder 
was found to be about half as effective as  the Pulsetech.   Boat electric 
in Seatle  also has  a product now and  so far I have not heard bad thngs 
about it.

As for me  I am quite happy  with  Pulsetech.  I have salvaged  literally 
thousands of dollars of batteries junked by mechanics who  found  batteries 
sulfated after  several months of winter storage without  a float charger. 
I once recovered a perfectly good and almost new  truck battery that had 
been abandoned foer 18 months . It recovered and is still in use.  On a 
couple of  boats with 32 volt  banks ( old fishing boats)  we managed to get 
another year or so out of the aging and well used  8V battereis. ( 8x4=32)
Pulsetech had extensive  white paper on their website  at one time.  These 
gave a good insight into the technology. They  said  80% of so called "dead" 
batteries were only sulfated and were recoverable.  20% of dead batteries 
suffered from plate shedding,  cracked plates and  other damage that was not 
recoverable.
I note this Nanopulser has an operating frequqncy of 10,000 GHz  compared to 
the original Pulsetech  which ran around 3.4 GHz.  I don't  know if this is 
just to avoid patent infringement or  has some  added benefit. Time and user 
testing  will tell.

As for a mega rip off - I dont see the price  for Nanopulser but the 
Pulsetech has seved me well. At the moment I am up to owning four Pulsetech 
plus one competitive brand.   They work for me.

I have no interest in the companies  except as a happy user who also use 
them  for  my system designs any time the owner agree to installing them. 
Since I  only recommend and do not sell them, I neither gain or lose  on the 
deal.

regards
Arild