[PUP] Redundancy (was Selen or Kadey Krogen)
John Marshall
johnamar1101 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 12:44:49 EST 2009
One of the advantages of redundant electronics is that you CAN go out
when a number of things are broken, as others are still working.
I ran around all last summer with one of my sounders out and didn't
fret. I just waited until it was convenient to fix it.
If that had been my only sounder, I would have stayed in port to fix it.
Same would go for one GPS, one Radar, one chartplotter.... likehood of
dual failures in a given time period is low.
The drawback is that it does cost more to buy and maintain more
equipment. But done right, you have few days where your travels are
dictated by equipment failures.
Of course, I wouldn't start a trip with my main engine out (and
running on wing only), so there are limits to this.
John
On Feb 20, 2009, at 3:51 AM, Truelove39 at aol.com wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Your thoughtful post came at a time when I was getting rid of
> redundancy;
> hence mine! So you might guess I respectfully disagree on the need
> for
> redundancy, which boat builders have taken to preach to owners so
> as to maximize
> their profits. Modern electronics and machinery are pretty
> bulletproof; aside
> from a close or direct lightning strike there's no need for duplicate
> electronics, IMHO. We are seeing more and more people who will not
> leave port because
> the wind instruments are inoperable or the AIS isn't working. How
> did we
> ever get along before we had all these wonderful gadgets? If one
> cannot tell how
> hard and from what direction the wind blows without an instrument,
> then one
> should stay ashore. We know many circumnavigators, some of whom
> have done it
> more than once, and they don't have all this redundancy which is
> often seen
> on coastal boats. Spares, sure, but not complete systems.
>
> Of course there's a high "gee whiz" factor in having lots of lights
> and
> knobs and switches, and if one has the wherewithal and the desire,
> by all means
> they should have their bells and whistles.
>
> I just uninstalled our 2nd VHF and wired the AIS direct to the
> antenna,
> eliminating the splitter. Why? Because using 2 VHFs (one on 16 and
> one on 13)
> has never worked well in practice - feedback and forgetting to turn
> the other
> one back up - I find it much simpler to use one. I will keep the
> 2nd VHF
> aboard as a spare and sell the splitter once we get back to the
> States.
>
> Regards,
>
> John
> "Seahorse"
>
>
>> c. The boat is light on current, redundant electronics. I'd
>> duplicate a
> source of chartplotting, radios and autopilot for a cruise of the
> length
> your considering.
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just
> 2 easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
> %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power
>
> To unsubscribe send email to
> passagemaking-under-power-request at lists.samurai.com with the word
> UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.
>
> Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World
> Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions.
More information about the Passagemaking-Under-Power
mailing list