[PUP] Full walk-around versus asymmetrical versus no walk-around
John Marshall
johnamar1101 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 14:07:56 EST 2008
OK... I'll kick this thread off by stating my own peculiar preferences:
A) No Walk-around: This is a significant problem for me if the boat
has very high bow or high freeboard, making both docking and picking
up a mooring buoy difficult.
B) Asymmetrical cabin (walk-around one side only): Preferred as long
as two conditions are met:
1) You are set up to be just as comfortable backing into a slip
under all wind conditions as going in forward. To me, that means
either a very capable rudder (perhaps even an articulated one), or a
great deck hand to spring it in, or a stern thruster.
2) Have easy access to non-walk-around side via a swim platform.
I have a stern thruster and swim platform and an asymmetrical cabin
and have never had an issue with ensuring I always have a starboard
dock.
C) Full walkaround: An undesirable tradeoff in loss of living space
for limited improvement in docking, assuming you can handle backing in
when needed as noted above.
So, I'm voting for asymmetrical with conditions as the optimum solution.
John Marshall
Serendipity - N5520
Sequim Bay, WA
> Now, how
> about a discussion about a full walk-around on a boat vs. just one
> side? How
> much fuel do you need for blue water passagemaking? What are the
> advantages
> and disadvantages of the front berth vs aft berth? Does every
> passagemaker
> need a watermaker?
More information about the Passagemaking-Under-Power
mailing list