[PUP] Krogen 55 Expedition vs Dashew FPB64
Ron Rogers
rcrogers6 at kennett.net
Sat Oct 20 22:13:12 EDT 2007
Ignoring the vagaries of mermaid hair, I do remember some emails on the
Trawler List where it was pointed out that some twin engine installations
consumed the same or less fuel than their single engine counterparts. I have
no clue as to why, but a single engine of "X" power may or may not burn more
fuel than twin engines of "1/2 X" power.
The arguments for twin engines on a world cruiser is just about as
meretricious as those for a single engine. I need to go back and read
Dashew's rationale for their going with twin engines.
Ron Rogers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Cooper" <swansong at gmn-usa.com>
|
| I'll bet those marketing Nordhavn and Kadey Krogen folks are capable of
| spinning the "assumptions" and coming up with very different "ranges" that
| each product is capable of. In reality you as the owner are the only one
| that can determine this. There isn't some magic range boosting hull that
| runs of the hall effect spun from the hair of mermaids. Similar hulls of
| similar weight, beam, wl, windage and power have very similar fuel burns
at the same displacement speeds.
|
| As always YMMV and usually does.....
|
| Dave & Nancy
More information about the Passagemaking-Under-Power
mailing list