[PUP] power catamarans
Philip Eslinger
pslinger@mindspring.com
Sat Mar 17 12:49:39 EST 2007
Some years ago (almost six now) when I was considering what kind of
power cruising boat to purchase, I gave considerable thought to the
benefits of a power catamaran. The apparent hull length of two
hulls gives many performance benefits: higher speed than a monohull
at higher power settings and lower fuel consumption at lower power
settings. The lateral stability of the wide beam precludes the need
for stabilizers and provides a fairly comfortable anchorage. I
researched the claim that cats were more prone to capsizing and
concluded that, without a mast and sails, they were not, particularly
after seeing several tank tests on hulls.
Cats do have a problem with heavy seas. Most cats have an anti-slam
nacelle under the bridge to ameliorate the slam of water that comes
up between the hulls in a head sea. I have to admit never having
been on a cat in such seas, but I've asked those who have.
Apparently this slam can be quite uncomfortable and even dangerous.
One of the all aluminum power catamarans used as a dive boat in Maui
had to be sent to Oahu and be re-welded because head seas caused the
cabin to break away from the hulls.
While there are many advantages to a cruising power catamaran, there
are also significant disadvantages which contributed to my decision
to go with a conventional monohull. Scott is correct when he says
that berthing in a marina is a major problem. The ride in heavy
weather was a factor. While a cat might make a wonderful coastal
cruiser when you can pick and choose your weather, I question its
comfort when crossing oceans. The last disadvantage is a big one:
marketplace. While much is being done with catamarans down in
Australia and New Zealand, they haven't received wide acceptance in
North America. When I retire from cruising, I'd like to be able to
get a fair value for my boat.
Phil Eslinger
Flat Earth N50
Ko Olina, Hi
More information about the Passagemaking-Under-Power
mailing list