[PUP] Fuel management ( was: Fuel consumption )
Truelove39 at aol.com
Truelove39 at aol.com
Sun Jul 29 06:36:09 EDT 2007
Hi Arild -
Congrats on the new job! Must be nice to work in a NA office. I worked with
some of those folks and long ago was a member of SNAME myself but let it
lapse. Amazing stuff, what those guys know.
We like the two tank system much better than the one on the sailboat, where
we have one large center tank and two smaller wing tanks to feed the main.
Here is how we manage our two-tank FO system on Seahorse: Our P&S tanks are 835
gallons each located under the galley sole forward of the ER. At 7 knots and
2.2 GPH we can travel far and can't see a difference that the extra 5 tons
makes. But our prismatic is better than that of a trawler hull. Management is
easy - we supply the ME from the stbd tank and always transfer to it from the
port tank. Reason being that we have a slight list to port with equal tank
levels and so use the fuel to keep an even keel. Transfer takes place through
a Racor 800D recycler/blender, so the fuel in the stbd tank is always
water-free and clean to 10 microns. Filling only one tank from shore makes fueling
easier.
There is also a 40 gallon day tank aft, filled via a separate line from the
Racor. That tank serves the heating plant and the pony engine, but can also
feed the ME if needed. We don't have a problem with condensation because the
tank tops are below the waterline and so the temperature is stable. We really
think this concern with condensation from "breathing" moist air through the
vents is overblown. Seahorse is out of the water for 4-5 months a year in
North Florida where, in winter, there can be large temperature changes daily, and
we have never had a problem with condensate. We think this particular bit of
concern comes from metal boats with skin tanks. We stopped using Biobor and
the like years ago and have never had a problem with the dreaded critters.
Biobor has problems of its own. A while back someone mentioned getting a
desiccant cap for the vent on a hydraulic SG tank. Sounded like a good idea to me.
Our tank is in the ER, and the oil temp runs about 160F. Must be some water
in the bottom, I thought, as I had neglected to check since buying the boat
almost 3 years ago. There wasn't.
Regards,
John
"Seahorse"
> Scott, you have touched on a key point.
FUEL MANAGEMENT and tankage arrangement should be one of the key design
elements when considering a vessel design.
Having one or two large tanks may prove a handicap in dealing with a large
quantity of bad or questionable fuel.
Several smaller tanks may be a better bet despite the increased cost of
additional piping and valves.
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
More information about the Passagemaking-Under-Power
mailing list