[PUP] sue 16

thataway4 at cox.net thataway4 at cox.net
Mon Dec 24 18:09:02 EST 2007


---- passagemaking-under-power-request at lists.samurai.com wrote: 
> Send Passagemaking-Under-Power mailing list submissions to
> 	passagemaking-under-power at lists.samurai.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	passagemaking-under-power-request at lists.samurai.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	passagemaking-under-power-owner at lists.samurai.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Passagemaking-Under-Power digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. chart lists (Truelove39 at aol.com)
>    2. Territorial waters and innocent passage (Scott E. Bulger)
>    3. Admirality Law links (Scott E. Bulger)
>    4. Re: Territorial waters and innocent passage (Dave Cooper)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:57:38 EST
> From: Truelove39 at aol.com
> Subject: [PUP] chart lists
> To: scottebulger at gmail.com
> Cc: passagemaking-under-power at lists.samurai.com
> Message-ID: <bbe.1dfe20c0.349fb542 at aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi  Scott:
>  
> Greetings  from rainy Trinidad!
>  
> To  Dave's and Bob's excellent posts, I might add:
>  
> Sailing  Directions and Coast Pilots are usually more up-to-date than most 
> charts and I  would certainly have them aboard, as well as a Reeds Caribbean  
> Almanac.
>  
> I  would look into NIMA (DMA) charts, too.
>  
> I  don't recall what your plans are exactly, but if you venture east of a 
> line from  the west end of PR to the Columbia/Venezuela border, get the 
> Imray-Iolaire  charts which have the benefit of Don Street's years of experience on 
> them.  
> 
> If  you haven't already done so, I suggest you join the SSCA. There are  
> hundreds of members cruising and their reports are up-to-date and are  published 
> in the Bulletin; you can ask specific questions on the web site  boards; they 
> have  cruising stations in most foreign countries and can provide local info 
> via email  before you get there.
>  
> Are  you set up to receive Inmarsat-C SafeNet warnings and other info? We  
> have a TT-3022D Capsat Fisheries unit on Seahorse that  automatically receives, 
> worldwide (you select the area), distress  messages,  navigational warnings 
> (Research vessels towing long arrays,  pirate activity, recent wrecks, navaids 
> extinguished, missing, etc.) as well  as NAVTEX. It also tracks your boat and 
> has a feature to write and  send a customized distress message. These services 
> are free - all you need  is the unit. See  this page for more info on SafeNet: 
> _http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/snet.htm_ 
> (http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/snet.htm) 
>  
> And when you get to the Caribbean, remember Don Street's famous words:  "If 
> you can see an island in the Bahamas, you're too close!"
>  
> No connection.
>  
> Happy cruising and Happy Holidays!
>  
> Regards,
>  
> John & Penny
> aboard "Truelove" in Trinidad 
>  
> 
> > Dave provides sage advice, all of which I will follow to a  T.
> 
> I visited a boat here in LP and looked at charts that Maptech had  provided
> in the last year or two and as Dave has suggested they are the  same.  So
> I've ordered a set of charts for the E side of CA and will  stay with what I
> have for the W.
> 
> Regarding all of Daves advice, I  assure you, even though Ive invested in a
> fair amount of technology to aid my  navigation, I take everything he says as
> golden.  I don't want these  charts so I can set my autopilot on a course and
> go to sleep.  I want  them so I have as much information at my disposal as I
> could possibly  use.  I also have the paper charts, which I even made sure
> were stacked  in order of ports passed along the way.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes 
> (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:12:56 -0800
> From: "Scott E. Bulger" <scottebulger at gmail.com>
> Subject: [PUP] Territorial waters and innocent passage
> To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'"
> 	<passagemaking-under-power at lists.samurai.com>
> Message-ID: <000b01c84576$4e889310$eb99b930$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Researching our trip North from the Panama Canal I came across a restriction
> in my insurance.  The countries of Columbia (except offshore islands),
> Nicaragua and Cuba are restricted from coverage.  I can neither sail through
> or to them or my policy is in breech (until 24hours after leaving).  I found
> the internationally recognized territorial limit is 12 miles.  I also found
> language in a reference to Admiralty Law that exempted the enforcement of
> restrictions against territorial limits for "Innocent Passage"
> 
>  
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocent_passage
> 
>  
> 
> I may not quite have phrased the above correctly, but the net of this (to my
> understanding) is I can transit the international waters of a country as
> long as I don't impeded the countries peace, security or good order.  I also
> believe I can anchor if necessary to maintain safety and security of the
> vessel.  
> 
>  
> 
> I don't think this would allow me to go to Cuba, but it would allow me to
> worry less about standing off the country as we go by on the way to Key
> West.  I still need to verify this with Al Golden, but I thought the
> research and especially the wiki pages on innocent passage and admiralty law
> might be of interest to others.
> 
>  
> 
> An idea I had for a great book (and encourage Capt. Mike Maurice to write)
> is a treatment of what it means to be the Captain of a private yacht
> involved in international travel.  I asked Mike if I could marry someone on
> my boat and he pondered the question for some time.  I wonder how many other
> "technicalities" there are out there that are not obvious to a guy like me
> that's too busy worrying about keeping his boat running to be fully informed
> of the law (law evolved over centuries of boats plying the oceans of the
> world).  I do think there is a book in there somewhere!
> 
>  
> 
> Best wishes to all of you for a joyous holiday (in my case Christmas) and a
> healthy and safe New Year!
> 
>  
> 
> Scott and Marian Bulger, Alanui, N40II, Seattle WA
> 
> Currently in Puerto Vallarta (not La Paz!) Mexico
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:28:17 -0800
> From: "Scott E. Bulger" <scottebulger at gmail.com>
> Subject: [PUP] Admirality Law links
> To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'"
> 	<passagemaking-under-power at lists.samurai.com>
> Message-ID: <001001c84578$73556ef0$5a004cd0$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Wow!
> 
>  
> 
> http://www.admiraltylawguide.com/
> 
>  
> 
> FYI
> 
>  
> 
> Scott Bulger, Alanui, N40II, Seattle WA
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:09:33 -0400
> From: "Dave Cooper" <swansong at gmn-usa.com>
> Subject: Re: [PUP] Territorial waters and innocent passage
> To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'"
> 	<passagemaking-under-power at lists.samurai.com>
> Message-ID: <000901c84597$5b865e50$3401a8c0 at Dell>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> <Scott wrote in part: The countries of Columbia (except offshore islands),
> Nicaragua and Cuba are restricted from coverage.>
> 
> The insurance companies are in general using outdated info to cover their
> exposure, IMHO. Columbia for at least the past year hasn't had any instance
> of armed aggression against yachts or the "pirating" of them. Wish we could
> say that of the rest of the Caribbean.
> 
> Passing thru territorial waters may or may not be considered OK by a
> particular country. It is up to them to define what they consider "innocent
> passage". Those run by more authoritarian types can be a problem. Quite
> often a new election, a new Port Commandant(Captain in some areas) or muscle
> flexing can lead to easier or tighter restrictions.
> 
> As John said earlier the SSB cruising nets, the SCCA books and in some cases
> the VHF nets can offer the most up to date information re a specific place
> or action. OTOH, often this information needs to be carefully filtered by
> the listener.
> 
> I would ask Al to specifically define what your insurance says/means for any
> passage that you feel might have a grey area re your coverage.
> 
> This is but one more of the reasons we choose self insurance. Our
> destinations are not limited by some underwriter sitting at a map of the
> world wondering where he can reduce or eliminate coverage without cutting
> into the revenue stream of writing policies.
> 
> We have been to both Cuba and Columbia and will be back cruising in Columbia
> next fall/winter if all goes well. Perhaps Cuba too after Jan 09 depending
> on the US election results.
> 
> We do have liability insurance and thru Al.
> 
> As always YMMV......
> 
> 
> Dave & Nancy
> Swan Song
> Roughwater 58
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Passagemaking-Under-Power Mailing List
> 
> End of Passagemaking-Under-Power Digest, Vol 37, Issue 16
> *********************************************************


More information about the Passagemaking-Under-Power mailing list