[PUP] Arild and the design build "thing"

Bob Frenier frenier at hughes.net
Sat Aug 4 08:45:07 EDT 2007


Jim wrote: Our experience with big alternators is that they are far less
efficient than an AC generator. 

Reply:

Jim, can you say a little more about whatever experience Nordhavn has with
the relative efficiency of gen sets vs. big alternators? Is there any
quantitative data you can share that outlines why "an alternator may take as
much as three times the power (fuel) to produce electricity than a
generator"?


Dave wrote: Shore power is also automatic. If the inverters see shore power
it takes precedence.

Reply:

Dave, what is your reasoning for having potentially erratic shore power run
direct to your inverter rather than to a (cheaper?) charger? Your excellent
explanation in recent posts for why you like to draw off your batteries
rather than a gen set (varying loads will always get enough juice from the
batteries) would seem to apply to oftentimes limited or unreliable shore
power. And wouldn't using a shore-to-charger-to-battery-to-inverter system
let you use European shore power without a lot of appliance conversions?

Bob Frenier
Chelsea, VT


More information about the Passagemaking-Under-Power mailing list