GL: Pump Outs 2
Gypsy5262 at aol.com
Gypsy5262 at aol.com
Wed Nov 4 16:54:00 EST 2009
My prices weren't hard and fixed . They were merely an example . But a use
it the most pay the most , sounds fair .
Theres a difference between emptying a port-o-potty and a yacht.
In a message dated 11/4/2009 3:49:39 P.M. Central Standard Time,
jjgill at twojscom.com writes:
Harold.
WOW. We only have a 60 gallon holding tank and you think that $60.00
for a pump out is more fare than my measly 5 cents per gallon
gasoline or 7 cents per gallon diesel fuel tax.
And , I thought I would get lots of negative replies!!!
John
====================================================
On Nov 4, 2009, at 4:31 PM, Gypsy5262 at aol.com wrote:
> I think we have about beat this horse to death !
>
> Either a flat , reasonable price for a pumpout or a by the gallon
> fee , such as up to10 gallons $5.00 ,
> up to 20 gallons $10.00 , up to 40 gallons $15.00 etc .
>
> That would be fair to all , no confusion , meters , or beaurocracy
> (sp) to impose a tax .
>
> Those use it the most pays the most.
>
> In a message dated 11/4/2009 3:13:21 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> jjgill at twojscom.com writes:
> Harold,
>
> That is indeed a creative alternative to a fuel tax, but that would
> require marinas to put water meters at their potable water station at
> the fuel / pump out dock and also at every transient slip for those
> who hook up to shore water when in port? Either that or charge those
> taking on water a flat fee if they use the water hook up at a
> transient slip. Our electric is metered, but transients pay a flat
> $5.00 fee per night for a 50 amp or twin 30 amp electric which is
> credited to the slip holder.
>
> This obviously would be preferred by the small boater (water ski boat
> or bass boat who don't have a house water tank.
>
> John
>
> =============================
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Harold R. Brink PE wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, some municipalities have a sewage charge that is a
> > percentage
> > of a property's water bill.
> >
> > A reasonable conclusion would be that it is logical put a tax on
> > marine use
> > water rather than fuel.
> >
> > Harold
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop
> >
> > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email
> address,
> > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/
> > great-loop
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop
>
> To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
> unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/
> great-loop
More information about the Great-Loop
mailing list